The training requirements of the scientific departments' heads in Sana'a University’s colleges in the electronic management subject.

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research is to identify the training requirements of the scientific departments’ heads in Sana’a University’s colleges in the electronic management subject from the research sample members’ perspective (Deans and Vice- Deans, Heads of Scientific Departments, and teaching staff), it also aims to identify the most important requirements that meet the training needs to hire an e- management in faculties. To achieve these objectives, the researcher used the descriptive survey analytic method. and used closed resolution as a tool which consists (53) paragraphs. The sample of research was selected in a stratified randomized manner that represented a (25%) percentage of the research community, and there were 301 males and females’ professors. The research used the (SPSS) program to analyze the data and the results was revealed as follows: The general axis of training requirements of the scientific departments’ heads in Sana’a University’s colleges in electronic management subject from the research sample point of view was rated at a total average (3,49 out of 5) with high needs rating, in the level, of the four fields, the requirements in the field of e- control got the highest average (3,56) , followed by the requirement of e- direction and supervision (3,48) ,and thirdly, e- regulation (3,47) , finally, e- planning with (3,47) all of them with a high need rating. The second axis, requirements that meet the training needs – got a total average (3,70 out of 5) with a verbal rating (high). There are no statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) in the average estimates of the research sample to the degree of training requirements for the scientific departments heads in the Sana'a University faculties in the electronic management subject due to (years of university experience, studying rank, and number of e- management training courses) variety at the tool level as a whole or sub- areas. There are statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the average of the sample members to the degree of training requirements due to a variable(job title at the level of five fields and the total level of tool, for the deans and vice- deans, with regard to social variable)in all fields and the total level of tool for males ,also with regard to (Specialization of the College only in the field of e- regulation) the differences were in favor of polytechnic colleges. In light of these findings, the research made some recommendations.